How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

What specific policy changes could the Labour Party implement to address the housing crisis in the UK, particularly in major cities like London?

For example, Jesus has a God …

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

Do individuals with borderline personality disorder have awareness of their actions or do they believe their behavior is normal?

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

An AIDS orphan, a pastor and his frantic search for the meds that keep her alive - NPR

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: